1) Relate
what was discussed in class or the text to the screening.
Much more sane than The
Big Lebowski, Fargo is a drama
set on entertaining with dark humor in contrast to its very wintry setting. One
aspect of the film that was talked about in class, other than the film being
based off of true events to an extent, is the accents and how exaggeratedly the
Coen brothers stressed them. I don't say this to say that people don't actually
have Swedish accents like in the film –– they do exist––but the accents were
definitely exaggerated in the sense that they really stood out and became the
first characteristic of a character, other than appearance, to really draw the
audience in and set the tone of the movie. I honestly feel they took this very
real aspect of Minnesota life and used it in such a clever way to get the most
comedic response out of it, having conversations that are clearly dead and over
revived with a bold "Ya!" Or having Marge, as the author of the
article I will introduce next mentions, give her “Okey Dokey!" and “Thanks
a bunch!” (Wilmington, par. 6) throughout the entire film with everyone she
encounters no matter how rude they are to her. From the minute Margie stepped
onto the screen I knew I was going to like this film, and it didn't let me down
from that moment on.
2) Find
a related article and summarize the content.
The article that I chose came from the
Chicago Tribune and it starts with author Michael Wilmington touching briefly on how the film begins and the setting. While contemplating the name of the film, Wilmington goes into talk of the plot making sure to compare the brother’s previous work. He then proceeds to touch on the comedy aspect of the Swedish accent used in the film that I touched on in the previous question above. The idea of a “feeling of truth” (Wilmington, par. 10) comes into play as the author notices that Fargo emphasizes the natural procession of how life really is: cluttered with crazy routines and plans that are always biting its creators in the rear end. Wilmington suggests that audience members are too accustomed to the cops and crooks that do what they do so well that they forget about the ones in real life that do not always have plans that run so smoothly. In real life, there are cops and crooks that are far from that pristine and flawless idea; they make mistakes, forget things, and screw up their own plans like in Fargo.
Chicago Tribune and it starts with author Michael Wilmington touching briefly on how the film begins and the setting. While contemplating the name of the film, Wilmington goes into talk of the plot making sure to compare the brother’s previous work. He then proceeds to touch on the comedy aspect of the Swedish accent used in the film that I touched on in the previous question above. The idea of a “feeling of truth” (Wilmington, par. 10) comes into play as the author notices that Fargo emphasizes the natural procession of how life really is: cluttered with crazy routines and plans that are always biting its creators in the rear end. Wilmington suggests that audience members are too accustomed to the cops and crooks that do what they do so well that they forget about the ones in real life that do not always have plans that run so smoothly. In real life, there are cops and crooks that are far from that pristine and flawless idea; they make mistakes, forget things, and screw up their own plans like in Fargo.
Wilmington, Michael. "`Fargo' A Dark Crime Comedy That's Just Real Enough." Chicago
Tribune. 08 Mar. 1996. Web. 13 Apr. 2016. <http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1996-03-08/entertainment/9603080005_1_marge-gunderson-maternity-clothes-movie>.
3) Apply
the article to the film screened in class.
This article didn’t really affect my
thinking or ideas about the film. I feel as though I liked the movie just the
same after reading it. I did like that it confirmed my thinking that the Coen
brothers did very well using the Swedish accents to add to their comedy
techniques in the film. One aspect of the Wilmington article that caught my eye
and made me think was when he mentioned the cinematography done by Roger
Deakins. Deakins was the cinematographer for not only The Big Lebowski, but the Shawshank
Redemption as well. I thought this was a fun fact and it made me think
about how vastly different all three of these films are. It is even more
interesting having seen all three films in class this semester. Compared to Fargo, The Big Lebowski was pushed in a more creative and innovative
direction when it came to cinematography. Deakins didn’t seem to hesitate to
pull out those very odd and whimsical angle decisions. For example, we see “The
Dude” in the dream sequence floating in between the legs of women down a
bowling alley and having his body knock into pins.
Kyle Buchanan wrote an article for Vulture, where Deakins tells of how his specification for very bright white light came into play for the dream sequence. However, in Fargo there were specific times with shots during the day and at night where Deakins specifically shot with little light to create the effect envisioned. I could tell that there didn’t seem to be many long shots in Fargo, but there were more in that particular film compared to The Big Lebowski. The Coen brothers tend to keep everything close up and personal with their films, switching between medium shots and close ups. One close up in Fargo that draws the audience into the intensity of the moment or what is happening, is the one of Marge the pregnant police chief. Not only is she my favorite character in the entire movie, but the one close up of her as she is driving the cop car with Gaear Grimsrud in the back of the car being incarcerated for the crimes that he committed. Marge contemplates and then confesses her confusion as to why Grimsrud would do such things. Similar to what Marge says in the film, there’s more to life than just money. I feel the brother’s close up feel of the films they make allow for the audience to focus more so on the characters introduced and to connect with them.
Kyle Buchanan wrote an article for Vulture, where Deakins tells of how his specification for very bright white light came into play for the dream sequence. However, in Fargo there were specific times with shots during the day and at night where Deakins specifically shot with little light to create the effect envisioned. I could tell that there didn’t seem to be many long shots in Fargo, but there were more in that particular film compared to The Big Lebowski. The Coen brothers tend to keep everything close up and personal with their films, switching between medium shots and close ups. One close up in Fargo that draws the audience into the intensity of the moment or what is happening, is the one of Marge the pregnant police chief. Not only is she my favorite character in the entire movie, but the one close up of her as she is driving the cop car with Gaear Grimsrud in the back of the car being incarcerated for the crimes that he committed. Marge contemplates and then confesses her confusion as to why Grimsrud would do such things. Similar to what Marge says in the film, there’s more to life than just money. I feel the brother’s close up feel of the films they make allow for the audience to focus more so on the characters introduced and to connect with them.
Buchanan, Kyle. "From Shawshank to Skyfall, How Master
Cinematographer Roger Deakins
Got These Ten Shots." Vulture.
21 Feb. 2013. Web. 13 Apr. 2016.
<http://www.vulture.com/2013/02/how-master-dp-roger-deakins-got-these-10-shots.html>.
4) Write a
critical analysis of the film.
To tie things up, I felt this would be a good time to
incorporate the handout from the class discussion about connotations. While the
author and other basic reference information is unknown, wherever this excerpt
came from, I enjoyed the read. The excerpt states, “Reading or analyzing a film
involves a concern less with a film’s explicit statements than with its
connotations: the complex set of ideas, beliefs, and associations that are
represented in it but that are never openly stated” (handout 20). I felt that
this quote was accurate and it brought me back to thinking about how complex Fargo actually is. The film has a lot
going on, and while it may just seem like this dark and humorous comedic twist
on a crime movie, it deals with complex situations that can actually happen. Fargo grounds us by introducing people
that are more relatable to who we are as individuals and who we see in the
world. The entire story is centered around money and death. Talk about bringing
something to the table. Are the Coen brothers trying to bring light to some of
the grim truths about life, what we usually take for granted and what is
important?
Furthermore, the expert also explains, “the fact that a film’s connotations may not immediately be evident from a casual viewing does not means that they are not there” (handout 20). This is very true to me with The Big Lebowski. Like I said in class, I always try to learn to appreciate the film and what it has done in the world despite my initial reaction to it. I may not have liked The Big Lebowski all that much the first time I saw it, but maybe if I give it another chance and watch it again I will not only like it more having done more research to understand the vision behind the film, but I may also make new revelations that may not have come into my mind during the first viewing. The experience will be like reading a poem or a book more than once and making new discoveries every single time. Overall, Fargo is a great film and it really shifted my perspective and how I thought about the Coen brothers an their work. Even with its own chaotic plot and storylines, I was able to somehow slip into my own thoughts and that is what I liked about it… it made me think but kept me focused on its presence.
Furthermore, the expert also explains, “the fact that a film’s connotations may not immediately be evident from a casual viewing does not means that they are not there” (handout 20). This is very true to me with The Big Lebowski. Like I said in class, I always try to learn to appreciate the film and what it has done in the world despite my initial reaction to it. I may not have liked The Big Lebowski all that much the first time I saw it, but maybe if I give it another chance and watch it again I will not only like it more having done more research to understand the vision behind the film, but I may also make new revelations that may not have come into my mind during the first viewing. The experience will be like reading a poem or a book more than once and making new discoveries every single time. Overall, Fargo is a great film and it really shifted my perspective and how I thought about the Coen brothers an their work. Even with its own chaotic plot and storylines, I was able to somehow slip into my own thoughts and that is what I liked about it… it made me think but kept me focused on its presence.
1) ( x ) I have not handed in this assignment for any
other class.
2) ( x ) If I reused any information
from other papers I have written for other classes, I clearly explain that in
the paper.
3) ( x ) If I used any passages word for word, I put
quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the
text.
4) ( x ) I have not padded the
bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in the text of
the paper.
5) ( x ) I have cited in the bibliography only the
pages I personally read.
6) ( x ) I have used direct quotations only in cases
where it could not be stated in another way. I cited the source within the
paper and in the bibliography.
7) ( x ) I did not so over-use direct
quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality.
8) ( x ) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have
been fully transparent about the research and ideas used in my paper.
Great report! I like how you discovered the Deakins connection! 10/10
ReplyDelete